Global brands rarely fail loudly. I have watched this happen from the inside. Companies enter new markets with momentum. Press coverage looks promising. Campaigns launch on schedule. Local teams are hired. Early dashboards suggest traction.

Then progress slows.

Customer interest plateaus. Partnerships take longer than expected. Internally, the conversation almost always turns to execution. Messaging must not be clear enough. The market probably needs more education.

What I have learned is that this conclusion is usually wrong.

What looks like market resistance is more often a signal that the brand is communicating from the wrong position.

When confidence turns into friction

Many global brands are built on confidence. Clear narratives. Strong positioning. A belief that what worked at home will travel.

I have seen leadership teams double down at this stage, convinced that clarity would solve the problem.

According to McKinsey, more than 70% of global transformations fail to achieve their stated objectives, often because leadership assumptions do not align with local realities.

In practice, the market is rarely asking for more explanation. It is asking for credibility.

Local pushback is not rejection

Entrepreneurs often misread silence or slow uptake as rejection. In many Asian markets, silence is not dismissal. It is assessment.

I have learned to treat these quiet periods as signals, not failures.

The Edelman Trust Barometer shows that trust expectations vary significantly by region, with many Asian markets placing greater weight on long-term commitment and reliability.

Audiences observe behavior long before they interpret messaging.

When execution questions miss the real issue

When performance stalls, companies usually look inward.

They question whether the message is clear enough, whether the creative is strong enough or whether local teams are moving fast enough.

I have watched capable local teams struggle under these assumptions, even when execution itself was strong.

Harvard Business Review notes that cross-border failures are often misattributed to execution, when the underlying issue is how leadership assumptions shape interpretation.

The brand was speaking as if it already belonged, while the market was still deciding whether to grant legitimacy.

Why local teams feel stuck

Local teams are often placed in an impossible position.

They are expected to deliver results while operating within global narratives they did not shape. When markets push back, local teams absorb the pressure, even though the root cause sits upstream.

Deloitte research shows that organizations with weak alignment between global strategy and local execution experience lower trust both internally and externally, reducing long-term performance.

Over time, markets do not just resist the brand — internal confidence erodes as well.

Why communication cannot sit downstream

For many founders and executives, communication is treated as a downstream activity. Strategy is decided first. Messaging follows.

In cross-market expansion, that order frequently fails.

Markets evaluate who is speaking before they evaluate what is being said. They read intent, patience and seriousness long before they assess differentiation.

When leaders fail to recalibrate how they show up, markets push back quietly rather than confront directly.

Slowing down to move forward

One of the most counterintuitive lessons I learned was that slowing down communication often restored momentum faster than accelerating it.

According to PwC, companies that invest in understanding local stakeholder expectations before scaling communication outperform peers in sustained market entry success.

In many markets, restraint reads as confidence.

Expansion tests humility, not ambition

Global expansion is often framed as a test of scalability. In reality, it is a test of humility.

The brands that succeed are not the ones that explain the most or speak the loudest. They are the ones that recognize when to pause, listen and adjust how authority is earned.

Markets rarely reject global brands outright. They resist being rushed into trust.

When leaders learn to recognize that difference, communication stops being a source of friction and becomes a source of momentum.

Global brands rarely fail loudly. I have watched this happen from the inside. Companies enter new markets with momentum. Press coverage looks promising. Campaigns launch on schedule. Local teams are hired. Early dashboards suggest traction.

Then progress slows.

The retail sector has hit a significant turning point, where customers keep buying online, but now with an additional feel of digital fatigue. People get tired of the endless scroll through product pages and sterile platforms.

Recent research from AIScreen suggests that ‘retailtainment’ — the strategic merging of retail and entertainment — can increase store visits and sales by 30%. With the experiential retail market projected to reach $543 billion by 2035, we are witnessing a transition in consumer behaviour. People are no longer looking to buy; they’re more interested in special moments and experiences.

For entrepreneurs, the question is how to use retailtainment to re-energise the customer base and grow in profits.

Sign up for Entrepreneur’s Franchise Bootcamp, a free, 5-day email course on how to find and invest in your first profitable franchise — no business experience required.

1. Gamified loyalty

Traditional loyalty programmes often feel like a chore as most of the collected points sit unused in a digital wallet. To fix this, businesses should redesign these programmes as they have a high potential to engage and retain users.

Challenge-based rewards and tiered achievements create a sense of anticipation. Use progress bars and social leaderboards to tap into a customer’s natural desire for progress. The goal is to make the customer feel as if they are in a game they want to win.

Brands that add gamification report a 47% rise in engagement and a 15% increase in brand awareness. In the retail sector specifically, conversion rates can jump by 50% through these gamified loyalty programmes.

Starbucks Rewards reached over 34 million active members in 2025, with 41% of U.S. sales now coming from loyalty members who spend 3X more and visit more frequently than non-members. For example, their gamified campaign ‘Double Star Days’ offered a chance to earn twice the usual stars to be spent later, thus creating an urgency and an increased flow of customers.

2. Social shopping

Online shopping is usually a solo thing, but it doesn’t have to be. The concept of ‘Social Shopping’ turns buying into a collaborative event. By creating platforms where people can shop together in real time, brands can bring back the social feel of a real shopping mall, but right from the comfort of your sofa.

When customers share suggestions and discuss products through live feeds or group chats, the likelihood of a purchase increases. Statistics show that 85% of consumers involve friends or family in their shopping journey via direct messages or live events. This shared environment gives shoppers the reassurance they want before hitting ‘buy’ and makes the whole experience feel more human.

The Chinese platform Pinduoduo popularised the ‘team purchase’ model, where users unite into groups to unlock lower prices. This model has traveled to Europe — the Blidz startup also adapted the same approach for local markets. By rewarding users for bringing their social circle into the shop, these brands lower their customer acquisition costs while making the shopping experience more entertaining.

3. Educational hubs

As for physical stores, they have quite an opportunity while trying to attract people offline. To fight digital fatigue, they can offer something the internet simply can’t: real, hands-on experiences.

Creating a place where people can learn and try things gives customers a reason to show up. And the demand is there: 81% of consumers worldwide say they’re happy to pay more for a better in-store experience.

Workshops and masterclasses help people actually understand how to use your products and get more value from them. The key is consistency, so these events become something people look forward to. And if the space looks good on camera, guests get a certificate, they’re probably going to make your workshop viral through social media.

Lululemon is a great example. With in-store yoga classes and wellness talks, their shops feel more like community hubs than retail spaces. That approach builds real loyalty – people visit not just to buy, but because the experience itself is worth the trip.

4. Social commerce

A strong social media strategy is more than product photos in your social media. It starts with a mindset shift: think like a content creator first, and a retailer second. This involves creating diverse content formats for each platform: short-form videos for TikTok, high-quality imagery for Instagram, catchy texts for Threads.

The real goal is simple: make buying feel effortless. When the whole journey from discovery to checkout can happen without leaving a social media profile, friction disappears. Add micro-influencers with trusted audiences into the mix and you get something traditional ads often miss: authenticity.

Millennials and Gen Z are set to drive over 60% of global social commerce spending. Even more, 67% of TikTok users say the platform has influenced them to order something they weren’t even going to buy.

5. Community-centric events

Finally, the best way to wake up a bored customer is to start building a real community. Trust is a massive deal, influencing 62% of shoppers when they decide where to spend. Think of teaming up with local makers, charities or cultural organisations for pop-up events, or find any other events that bring people together. It’s also worth looking into ambassador programmes, featuring your actual customers, who genuinely live your brand’s values.

Retailtainment is a direct response to a massive shift in what people actually care about. By focusing on gamification, social interaction, education, and community, businesses can turn fatigued users into active participants. At the end of the day, the future of retail isn’t just about the sale itself — it’s about everything that happens around it.

Sign up for the Money Makers newsletter to get weekly, expert-backed tips to help you earn more money — from real people who founded and scaled successful businesses. Get it in your inbox.

The retail sector has hit a significant turning point, where customers keep buying online, but now with an additional feel of digital fatigue. People get tired of the endless scroll through product pages and sterile platforms.

Recent research from AIScreen suggests that ‘retailtainment’ — the strategic merging of retail and entertainment — can increase store visits and sales by 30%. With the experiential retail market projected to reach $543 billion by 2035, we are witnessing a transition in consumer behaviour. People are no longer looking to buy; they’re more interested in special moments and experiences.

The founder of one of our portfolio companies created a company with approximately $200 million in revenue purely on instinct. The founder had spent a large amount of time around the products and relationships with customers, so that he could literally go out onto the production floor and identify the machine that would be broken down in a week, and he would reject a price recommendation from his financial staff because “it didn’t feel right!”

However, after buying another company and nearly doubling the size of the business, all of the things that made the founder successful initially started to work against him.

Eventually, over a period of six months, I watched the speed of the company’s decision-making slow to a crawl. What was once a strength was now a barrier that none of his senior managers knew how to overcome.

Instinctual decision making

A founder’s instinct is a real tool that works well. I have seen it often enough to know that it is not just luck. He has experienced each and every area of the business, and all of this collective experience produces a type of judgment that is faster and more accurate than any committee or group.

It is not that the founder’s instinct stops providing valuable insight. It is that it does not grow. Research by McKinsey states that 78% of companies that have successfully found product-market fit ultimately fail to grow their companies.

At some point in their development, the companies will reach what McKinsey refers to as a “natural limit to early stage growth,” at which point “the approach that enabled the company to achieve success to that point is no longer capable of enabling further upward momentum.”

At $20 million in revenues and with 50 employees, it is easier to stay connected with everything. But it becomes difficult at $200 million in revenues and 400 employees at multiple locations. The founder is basing his gut decisions on summaries, dashboards and reports provided by others. The founder’s instinct is still operating — but with incomplete data.

What breaks down first

Firstly, the breakdown is not the company’s performance; it is the leadership team. When a founder’s intuition becomes the final word in every decision, the organization develops a lack of willingness to make decisions.

Secondly, the breakdown occurs when the company needs more than ever to rely on its leadership team to make effective decisions.

I’ve seen many talented Chief Operating Officers (COOs) and Chief Financial Officers (CFOs) lose their ability to lead and instead become simply order takers. The company is growing. The founder is still making most of the decisions. Everyone is convinced that this is the way large, successful companies are run.

But at some point, when something unexpected happens, the competitor takes an action that the founder didn’t anticipate. The product launch is a failure. And at that point, the team is called upon to respond quickly. But they can’t because no one really knows how.

Transforming intuition to institution

The transition from the founder’s intuition to the institutionalization of decision-making is not about removing the founder’s ability to make decisions — it is about creating the systems so that decisions are made as well as they possibly can without the founder.

There must be a transformation of three critical areas of the company:

1. The engine room (the core operating functions)

2. The accelerators (growth drivers)

3. The cockpit (the control center, where leadership and decision-making authority reside)

Here’s the reality

Decision rights are defined formally. I helped a CEO create a matrix of all major types of decisions (pricing, hiring, capital allocation, M&A, etc.) and established thresholds.

The General Manager (GM) has decision-making authority for all issues under $500,000 and within the scope of the strategy. Issues above the threshold or outside of the scope of the strategy require CEO approval. While this may seem simple, it was the first time that the company wrote down a set of rules to govern decision-making.

With the documented decision-making process becoming part of institutional knowledge, the team will begin to learn how to address issues in the same manner as the founder.

Frameworks replace intuition for repetitive decisions. Intuition is best suited for novel, high-risk decisions but is less effective for decisions that are repeated on a regular basis, such as pricing reviews, hiring approvals and purchasing vendors, and should be governed by established frameworks rather than intuition.

The test you don’t want to take

I ask the same question with every founder I meet: “If you went away for a four-week vacation and were unable to check your email or cell phone, what would fail?” Generally, the founder provides an honest assessment of the many items that would fail, but the issue is the honesty.

If a company cannot continue to operate for four weeks without the founder being involved in every single decision, then the company is not yet an institution — it’s just a very well-funded version of the founder’s brain.

The implications of this are severe. The likelihood of failure or decline in performance associated with the transition of a founder-CEO is approximately two to three times that of the transition of a non-founder CEO.

How I’ve seen success happen

Founders who successfully navigate this transition do not try to fight their natural tendencies — they redirect them. Rather than using their intuition to make every decision, founders start to use their intuition to build people who can help them make decisions.

For example, a CEO I am currently consulting with spends about 50% of his time having one-on-one meetings with members of his executive team, where he walks them through the thought process he used to solve a specific problem, not just the solution itself.

The founder’s job is to stop being the bottleneck and become the teacher.
It is difficult, but it is the only path forward.

Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter to get the news and resources you need to know today to help you run your business better. Get it in your inbox.

The founder of one of our portfolio companies created a company with approximately $200 million in revenue purely on instinct. The founder had spent a large amount of time around the products and relationships with customers, so that he could literally go out onto the production floor and identify the machine that would be broken down in a week, and he would reject a price recommendation from his financial staff because “it didn’t feel right!”

However, after buying another company and nearly doubling the size of the business, all of the things that made the founder successful initially started to work against him.

The “no-hire, no-fire” era may be ending. U.S. employers announced 108,435 layoffs in January, the highest for any January since the 2009 financial crisis, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The total was up 118% from January 2025.

Companies announced just 5,306 new hires, the lowest January since 2009 when Challenger began tracking the data. Transportation had the highest level of cuts as UPS plans to eliminate more than 30,000 workers. Technology was second after Amazon announced 16,000 job cuts.

Andy Challenger told CNBC the high total signals employers set these plans at the end of 2025 and are “less-than-optimistic about the outlook for 2026.” Initial jobless claims totaled 231,000 for the week ended January 31, the highest since early December, though a brutal winter storm likely contributed to the spike.

Read more

The “no-hire, no-fire” era may be ending. U.S. employers announced 108,435 layoffs in January, the highest for any January since the 2009 financial crisis, according to outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas. The total was up 118% from January 2025.

Companies announced just 5,306 new hires, the lowest January since 2009 when Challenger began tracking the data. Transportation had the highest level of cuts as UPS plans to eliminate more than 30,000 workers. Technology was second after Amazon announced 16,000 job cuts.

Andy Challenger told CNBC the high total signals employers set these plans at the end of 2025 and are “less-than-optimistic about the outlook for 2026.” Initial jobless claims totaled 231,000 for the week ended January 31, the highest since early December, though a brutal winter storm likely contributed to the spike.

Read more

Last week, Pinterest laid off just under 15% of its staff due to restructuring and investing in AI projects. After the announcement, several engineers created software to identify which colleagues were laid off. Pinterest CEO Bill Ready fired them too, calling their behavior “obstructionist.”

Ready defended the firings at an all-hands meeting last week, saying Pinterest was facing a “critical moment” and employees who disagree with the company’s direction should consider working elsewhere. “There’s a clear line between constructive debate and behavior that’s obstructionist,” Ready said, according to audio obtained by CNBC. A Pinterest spokesperson said the engineers “improperly accessed confidential company information” and violated privacy policies.

However, several Pinterest employees disagree, saying the engineers simply posted instructions showing how to prompt the company’s existing staff directory to show who was laid off. The tool was accessible to anyone in the company, they said.

Read more

Last week, Pinterest laid off just under 15% of its staff due to restructuring and investing in AI projects. After the announcement, several engineers created software to identify which colleagues were laid off. Pinterest CEO Bill Ready fired them too, calling their behavior “obstructionist.”

Ready defended the firings at an all-hands meeting last week, saying Pinterest was facing a “critical moment” and employees who disagree with the company’s direction should consider working elsewhere. “There’s a clear line between constructive debate and behavior that’s obstructionist,” Ready said, according to audio obtained by CNBC. A Pinterest spokesperson said the engineers “improperly accessed confidential company information” and violated privacy policies.

However, several Pinterest employees disagree, saying the engineers simply posted instructions showing how to prompt the company’s existing staff directory to show who was laid off. The tool was accessible to anyone in the company, they said.

Read more

Software startups frequently struggle to make a name for themselves with potential customers, especially when it comes to landing a large licensing deal. Prospective clients usually buy large platform licenses through their procurement offices, which look at the platform’s performance and dependability.

Because startups typically don’t have a track record of success to attract potential clients, they can offer a trial of their platform for free or at a lower cost to showcase what their platform can do and how reliable it is. The enterprise — a potential client — can test the newest technologies without the worry of committing to a complete and often costly rollout.

The pilot contract: an overview

A temporary arrangement that allows a company to test a new project on a small scale, a pilot program enables an enterprise to evaluate a project’s success before making a bigger commitment. To protect itself, the startup usually creates a “pilot contract,” a legal document that outlines the agreement. The pilot contract enables an enterprise temporary access to a startup’s new platform and may include some early features still being tested.

The pilot contract helps startups in various ways — it reduces their legal responsibilities and lowers risks; safeguards their ideas and inventions; and assists in getting their platform up and running. A trial contract can help potential clients bring in a new supplier to enhance their current work processes, and when the enterprise looks at fully using the startup’s platform, they can depend on what they learned during the trial.

A fictional partnership

StoreBuddy is a fictional software startup offering a computer vision platform for retail outlets.

It uses the latest technology to monitor shopper behavior, including how they navigate through stores, where the highest foot traffic is, and how much time they spend interacting with products and displays.

Town Square Retail is a fictional national chain that has had trouble understanding why its revenues have remained stagnant. The company knows it needs a solution to remain competitive, but it’s not ready to implement a large, systemwide platform yet.

Pilot contracts lower risk

StoreBuddy provides a trial license to Town Square Retail at a much lower cost to be utilized only within a select number of stores. This reduces Town Square Retail’s financial risk because there is very little or no money involved if StoreBuddy doesn’t work as expected. Additionally, only a small number of sites have uploaded data to the platform, which reduces Town Square Retail’s responsibility if any data is mismanaged.

Since Town Square Retail will pay a lower fee, StoreBuddy can further minimize its responsibilities by providing a brief license period of between three and six months. They can also limit all guarantees, avoid fixing bugs and restrict any direct or indirect damages to the amount of the lower license fee.

StoreBuddy, in turn, will not provide any guarantees or promises in the pilot contract that would reduce its responsibility, nor will it agree to protect or pay back Town Square Retail for any claims made by other parties against Town Square Retail for using the platform.

Pilot contracts protect startup IP

Pilot contracts outline the startup’s rights and ensure its valuable assets — like ideas, inventions and creative work — developed during the project belong to the startup. This enables startups to focus on innovating without the concern of losing their unique ideas.

In our example, Town Square Retail has access to StoreBuddy’s private documents that explain the platform’s features. But it’s in StoreBuddy’s best interest to make sure that Town Square Retail keeps those documents under wraps until the features are made widely available.

To protect itself, StoreBuddy adds terms to the pilot contract that guarantee privacy. As such, Town Square Retail will not share platform details with outside parties. Further, it may upload only “dummy data,” which prevents them from learning how the platform works. It also stops Town Square retail from looking for another provider to either add similar features to its own product or create an internal product that renders StoreBuddy’s paid products and services unnecessary.

Advantages to the client

After the initial agreement period, Town Square Retail saw improved operations and an increase in its monthly revenue. It also saw a reduced number of shoplifting incidents. Town Square Retail identified items that weren’t selling well, which prompted them to remove those items from the shelves and offer new products for their discerning customers. Town Square Retail gained a strong reputation among its employees and customers and was lauded for its variety of products placed creatively throughout their stores.

This ultimately led to a formal agreement between StoreBuddy and Town Square Retail whereby StoreBuddy’s platform was rolled out to all of Town Square Retail’s locations.

Advantages to the startup

Besides proving that StoreBuddy’s product works, the company also gained the trust of a new customer. This made it easier for them to approach investors and attract new business. Additionally, the long-term contract brought in significant revenues that enabled the team to enhance its offerings. StoreBuddy used the pilot project to attract potential investors, resulting in a funding round.

The pilot was a success and benefited both companies.

Creating a pilot contract: Helpful tips

When creating a pilot contract, there are several guidelines to keep in mind.

• To reduce their financial risk, both sides should make sure that the details about the project, costs and contract duration are clear.
• To avoid potential issues that come with offering a lower fee structure, the startup should include statements in the contract indicating that it is not responsible for fixing bugs or for service interruptions; that it won’t cover any legal claims; and that it limits its responsibility to the amount of the reduced license fee.
• In an effort to keep trade secrets and competitive information confidential, IP and security clauses should be documented.
• To minimize privacy risks on the client and the enterprise side, the contract clause should restrict the client’s data use.
• In the event the client chooses to discontinue the pilot program, contract language that allows it to cancel for any reason — no questions asked — offers protection.

The bottom line

Implementing a pilot contract is beneficial to startups and enterprises alike. Startups can open new avenues for growth, increase the bottom line and lower their liability risk. Enterprises can partner with startups early to evaluate new solutions at a lower cost and foster innovation.

Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter to get the news and resources you need to know today to help you run your business better. Get it in your inbox.

Software startups frequently struggle to make a name for themselves with potential customers, especially when it comes to landing a large licensing deal. Prospective clients usually buy large platform licenses through their procurement offices, which look at the platform’s performance and dependability.

Because startups typically don’t have a track record of success to attract potential clients, they can offer a trial of their platform for free or at a lower cost to showcase what their platform can do and how reliable it is. The enterprise — a potential client — can test the newest technologies without the worry of committing to a complete and often costly rollout.

Sam Altman is not happy about Anthropic’s new Super Bowl ads. The OpenAI CEO took to X to write a novella-long rant against his AI rival after Anthropic released commercials mocking ChatGPT’s upcoming ads. One spot shows a man asking ChatGPT for advice on talking to his mom, only to have the bot twist the conversation into an ad for a fictitious cougar-dating site called Golden Encounters.

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.

But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic…

— Sam Altman (@sama) February 4, 2026

Altman called Anthropic “dishonest” for implying ChatGPT would twist conversations to insert ads. But OpenAI has said it plans to test ads “at the bottom of answers in ChatGPT when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation.”

Altman also called Anthropic “authoritarian,” accusing the company of wanting to control what people do with AI. The rant over a cheeky Super Bowl ad clearly showed Anthropic hit a nerve.

Read more

Sam Altman is not happy about Anthropic’s new Super Bowl ads. The OpenAI CEO took to X to write a novella-long rant against his AI rival after Anthropic released commercials mocking ChatGPT’s upcoming ads. One spot shows a man asking ChatGPT for advice on talking to his mom, only to have the bot twist the conversation into an ad for a fictitious cougar-dating site called Golden Encounters.

First, the good part of the Anthropic ads: they are funny, and I laughed.

But I wonder why Anthropic would go for something so clearly dishonest. Our most important principle for ads says that we won’t do exactly this; we would obviously never run ads in the way Anthropic…

— Sam Altman (@sama) February 4, 2026

Altman called Anthropic “dishonest” for implying ChatGPT would twist conversations to insert ads. But OpenAI has said it plans to test ads “at the bottom of answers in ChatGPT when there’s a relevant sponsored product or service based on your current conversation.”

Altman also called Anthropic “authoritarian,” accusing the company of wanting to control what people do with AI. The rant over a cheeky Super Bowl ad clearly showed Anthropic hit a nerve.

Read more

If you run an e-commerce business, this is the update you can’t afford to ignore:

You can now shop directly inside ChatGPT.

OpenAI recently launched a feature called Instant Checkout, which allows users to discover, compare, and buy products without ever leaving the chat.

That means ChatGPT is no longer just a tool to answer questions. It’s now a place where shopping decisions start and finish.

So, what does that mean for your brand? It means your products need to be visible, understandable and structured for AI. Not just for Google, but for a new kind of customer journey that skips traditional search altogether.

Related: After Helping Hundreds of Brands, These Are the Social Media Moves I Recommend in 2026

What is ChatGPT Shopping?

The new ChatGPT Shopping experience lets users ask for a product in natural language — something like “Show me black sneakers under $100” — and instantly get curated suggestions pulled from major retailers like Walmart and platforms like Shopify and Stripe.

Not only do they see real-time pricing and reviews, but in some cases, they can check out right there in the chat.

This is made possible by partnerships with e-commerce platforms and payment providers. ChatGPT pulls live data using APIs and structured content, so if your product isn’t built for machines to read, it won’t show up.

Let’s make that clear: you can’t buy your way in right now. This isn’t ad-driven (yet). It’s data-driven.

Why this matters for entrepreneurs

Most business owners are still optimizing for traditional SEO or running paid campaigns. But ChatGPT changes the rules.

Instead of typing “best travel backpacks” into Google, people are asking ChatGPT, “What’s a lightweight backpack for a two-week Europe trip under $150?” And ChatGPT gives them an answer, complete with product cards, summaries and sometimes a buy button.

This shift means:

• Fewer people are clicking through search results
• Product discovery is now conversational
• Brands need to structure their content for AI, not just humans

It’s not just about visibility anymore. It’s about being part of the answer.

So, how do you show up in ChatGPT Shopping?

Here’s what to focus on if you want your products to appear (and convert) in this new AI-powered ecosystem.

1. Use schema markup on your product pages

Structured data is how ChatGPT knows what your product is, how much it costs, and whether it’s in stock. Without it, you’re invisible.

Add product schema for:

• Price and availability
• Product name and description
• Ratings and reviews
• Images

There are free tools that make this easy (like Google’s Schema Markup Helper). If you’re using Shopify, plugins can help you automate it.

2. Write like your customer talks

ChatGPT doesn’t think in keywords, it thinks in conversations.

That means your product copy should sound naturallike a friend recommending something. Swap jargon for benefits. Swap features for clarity.

• Instead of: “Engineered thermoplastic elastomer with antimicrobial upper”
• Say: “Comfortable and flexible material that stays clean and breathable”

Products that are easy to describe are easier to recommend.

3. Use clear, searchable product names

Avoid clever names without context.

• “The Riptide X” means nothing to ChatGPT or to your customer.
• Try: “Men’s Waterproof Trail Running Shoes – Riptide X”

This gives AI more to work with and increases your chances of being surfaced in a relevant query.

4. Keep your reviews fresh and visible

ChatGPT prioritizes products with social proof, especially recent reviews. If your last review was from 2022, you’re giving AI nothing to work with. Make sure:

• Reviews are up to date
• Testimonials mention real product benefits
• Ratings are consistent across platforms

If you sell on Amazon, Etsy or your own site, monitor and encourage reviews regularly.

5. Don’t ignore mobile speed

If someone taps a product link from ChatGPT and your site loads slow, that’s a lost sale. Test your mobile performance using PageSpeed Insights and cut anything that delays the first interaction.

Fast load times also improve your visibility across all platforms, not just ChatGPT.

The funnel is changing

ChatGPT Shopping isn’t just another channel; it represents a shift in how people find, evaluate and buy products.

Where traditional funnels relied on multiple steps like search > browse > compare > buy, this new model condenses the entire journey into a single conversation.

That creates huge upside for brands that adapt early. It also punishes anyone relying solely on paid ads or SEO.

You need to think about zero-click discovery. Customers might not even land on your site. But if ChatGPT recommends your product and links to it, you’re still winning.

Related: I Used This Simple ‘Onion Strategy’ to Turn Pointless Content Into Paying Customers

Where to get started

With ChatGPT Shopping rolling out now, the brands that succeed are the ones who make their products easy to find, understand and buy inside an AI-powered interface.

You don’t need to overhaul your entire site. But you do need to structure your product content in a way that machines (and humans) can use.

This is the new front door to your store. If you want customers to walk through it, start speaking the language of AI, clearly, conversationally, and fast.

If you run an e-commerce business, this is the update you can’t afford to ignore:

You can now shop directly inside ChatGPT.

AI has changed the speed of business. The tools are smarter. The workflows are tighter. Automation now powers everything from emails to reports to meeting recaps. Execution has never been easier.

However, as the systems move faster, something else is slowing down. Leadership.

It does not always happen in obvious ways. The systems are running. Deadlines are met. Messages are delivered. Teams are producing.

And yet, something feels off.

Leadership is not showing up where it’s needed most. Not in tone. Not in presence. Not in decision-making.

Leadership drift

This is not about leaders losing interest. It is about how easily drift sets in when the system is running smoothly. The more we automate, the less we notice when something human is missing. What used to be a moment for alignment now passes without conversation. What used to be a gut check now moves forward on default settings.

Leadership drift does not announce itself. It shows up in quiet ways. A decision gets made without context. A question goes unanswered because no one’s sure who owns it. Communication gets faster, but clarity drops.

Over time, the cost compounds. People move faster, but not always together. Tasks get completed, but the meaning behind them is less clear. Momentum becomes motion without direction.

AI does not cause this drift. It simply allows it to happen unnoticed.

That is what makes it dangerous — not because the tool is flawed, but because it works so well.

AI can write the update. It can generate the slide. It can summarize the meeting. But it cannot set priorities. It cannot hold trust. It cannot step in when the tone is off or when the room needs steadying.

Those responsibilities still belong to leaders.

When they step back too far, the system keeps going … until something breaks.

And often by then, the signals that would have prompted a course correction are long gone.

This is not about rejecting technology. The right tools are helping companies scale faster and operate more efficiently. But leadership has to scale alongside it.

What does that actually look like?

It starts with reengaging in the moments that matter. Leaders need to be more precise with when and how they show up. That might mean less time managing tasks and more time reinforcing direction. Less time reacting to output and more time setting tone early.

It also means checking assumptions. Just because things look efficient does not mean they are aligned. Just because tasks are getting done does not mean the team is clear on what matters most.

In a high-speed system, drift happens in silence. It is not a lack of productivity. It is a lack of connection. And leadership has to be the one to restore it.

Leadership today does not mean being everywhere at once. It means knowing when your presence makes the most difference. That could be five minutes of clarity at the start of a project. It could be a check-in when priorities feel scattered. It could be a moment of stillness when the team is spinning faster than it should.

Your job is not to chase the system. It is to keep your team rooted inside it. That takes intention. It takes attention. And it takes the discipline to step in before drift becomes damage.

You don’t need to be perfect. You need to be visible. People can work through almost anything, as long as they still feel led.

Presence still matters. Not because you need to be in every room, but because the people who are still showing up need to know you’re there with them. Not watching. Not micromanaging. Leading.

That means stepping in before energy slips, clarifying priorities before the team overextends and holding decisions with enough visibility that others feel supported, not on their own.

Leaders are not being asked to solve everything. They are being asked to show up consistently. To speak clearly. To name confusion early and to lead from a place of steadiness, not noise. That’s the kind of leadership teams follow — especially when the pace is high and the signals are mixed.

Lead with intention

Leadership is not about more effort. It is about more intention.

And now that the tools are getting better, that intention is more visible than ever.

The leaders who succeed in this environment are not the ones who push harder. They are the ones who listen sooner, speak clearly, name the drift before it spreads and make decisions that remind people what direction looks like, even when the system is doing most of the work.

The gap between execution and alignment is widening. AI is not the cause. But it will speed up the effects if leadership is not actively present.

This is not a temporary shift. It is the new normal.

And the companies that keep their leadership grounded in clarity, trust and visibility will move faster without losing themselves along the way.

Because when the systems take over the pace, the leader still sets the tone.

Sign up for the Entrepreneur Daily newsletter to get the news and resources you need to know today to help you run your business better. Get it in your inbox.

AI has changed the speed of business. The tools are smarter. The workflows are tighter. Automation now powers everything from emails to reports to meeting recaps. Execution has never been easier.

However, as the systems move faster, something else is slowing down. Leadership.