Hackers Scanning for VMware vCenter Servers Affected by Critical Vulnerability

Just one day after VMware announced the availability of patches for a critical vulnerability affecting vCenter Server, hackers have started scanning the internet for vulnerable servers.

The flaw, tracked as CVE-2021-21972, affects the vSphere Client component of vCenter Server and it can be exploited by a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands with elevated privileges on the operating system that hosts vCenter Server.

While in most cases an attacker would need to have access to the targeted organization’s network in order to exploit the vulnerability, there are over 6,000 potentially vulnerable systems that are accessible directly from the internet.

Many of these servers are located in the United States, Germany, China, France and the United Kingdom.

Cybersecurity firm Positive Technologies, whose researchers discovered the flaw and reported it to VMware, has released technical details for the vulnerability after seeing that several individuals had released proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code shortly after the virtualization giant announced the availability of patches.

VMware published its advisory on February 23, and threat intelligence company Bad Packets reported on February 24 that it had already detected “mass scanning activity” targeting vCenter servers affected by CVE-2021-21972.

Mikhail Klyuchnikov, the Positive Technologies researcher credited for finding the vulnerability, said this flaw is just as dangerous as a widely exploited Citrix vulnerability tracked as CVE-2019-19781.

“If the vulnerable software can be accessed from the Internet, this will allow an external attacker to penetrate the company’s external perimeter and also gain access to sensitive data,” he explained.

Related: BIG-IP Vulnerability Exploited to Deliver DDoS Malware

Related: Hackers Scanning for Apache Tomcat Servers Vulnerable to Ghostcat Attacks

Related: Scanning Activity Detected After Release of Exploit for Critical SAP SolMan Flaw

view counter

Eduard Kovacs (@EduardKovacs) is a contributing editor at SecurityWeek. He worked as a high school IT teacher for two years before starting a career in journalism as Softpedia’s security news reporter. Eduard holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial informatics and a master’s degree in computer techniques applied in electrical engineering.

Previous Columns by Eduard Kovacs:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/2RaAdsIcARc/hackers-scanning-vmware-vcenter-servers-affected-critical-vulnerability




Google Discloses Details of Remote Code Execution Vulnerability in Windows

Google’s cybersecurity research unit Project Zero on Wednesday disclosed the details of a recently patched Windows vulnerability that can be exploited for remote code execution.

The flaw, tracked as CVE-2021-24093, was patched by Microsoft on February 9 with its Patch Tuesday updates. Dominik Röttsches of Google and Mateusz Jurczyk of Google Project Zero have been credited for reporting the issue to Microsoft.

A CVSS score of 8.8 has been assigned to the vulnerability, but Microsoft has rated it critical for all affected operating systems. The list includes Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 and 2019, and Windows Server.

According to Microsoft, the security hole impacts a Windows graphics component and it can be exploited by luring the targeted user to a website hosting a specially crafted file set up to exploit the flaw.

The Google researchers reported the vulnerability to Microsoft in late November and the bug report was made public on Wednesday, roughly two weeks after Microsoft released a patch.

Jurczyk and Röttsches described CVE-2021-24093 as a DirectWrite heap-based buffer overflow related to the processing of a specially crafted TrueType font. They explained that an attacker can trigger a memory corruption condition that can be leveraged to execute arbitrary code in the context of the DirectWrite client. DirectWrite is a Windows API designed for high-quality text rendering.

The researchers tested their exploit on a fully patched Windows 10 in all major browsers. In addition to technical details, they released a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit.

However, based on its exploitability assessment, Microsoft does not believe the vulnerability will be exploited in the wild.

Related: Google: Microsoft Improperly Patched Exploited Windows Vulnerability

Related: Google Chrome, Microsoft IE Zero-Days in Crosshairs

Related: Microsoft’s Patch for LSASS Flaw Incomplete, Google Researcher Says

Related: Microsoft Patches Windows Vulnerability Chained in Attacks With Chrome Bug

view counter

Eduard Kovacs (@EduardKovacs) is a contributing editor at SecurityWeek. He worked as a high school IT teacher for two years before starting a career in journalism as Softpedia’s security news reporter. Eduard holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial informatics and a master’s degree in computer techniques applied in electrical engineering.

Previous Columns by Eduard Kovacs:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/zxqUk3dioRM/google-discloses-details-remote-code-execution-vulnerability-windows




Webinar Today: Evaluating Vendor Risk With Security Ratings

Why 2021 Is The Year of Security Ratings

Learn About the Benefits of Security Ratings – Register

Leveraging security ratings as part of your cyber risk management program provides metrics that help you cut through the complexity to understand where the risk lies in your digital and vendor ecosystem.

Join SecurityWeek and BitSight for a live webinar on Wednesday, February 24th at 1PM ET to learn how you can use security ratings to:

• Target the areas of specific risk in your entire ecosystem

• Gain insight into the risk posed by your supply chain vendors

• Establish a benchmark for security performance against industry standards

• Evaluate your cybersecurity hygiene measures to understand which have the greatest impact

Register for Webinar

Can’t make the live event? Register now and you’ll get a link to watch on demand at your convenience.

view counter

Previous Columns by SecurityWeek News:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/B-2L-actU1A/webinar-today-evaluating-vendor-risk-security-ratings




Critical VMware vCenter Server Flaw Can Expose Organizations to Remote Attacks

VMware on Tuesday informed customers that its vCenter Server product is affected by a critical vulnerability that can be exploited by an attacker to execute commands with elevated privileges.

vCenter Server is a management software designed to provide a centralized platform for controlling VMware vSphere environments. The critical vulnerability, discovered by Positive Technologies researcher Mikhail Klyuchnikov, impacts a vCenter Server plugin used by the vSphere Client.

The flaw, tracked as CVE-2021-21972 with a CVSS score of 9.8, can be exploited by an attacker with network access to port 443 to “to execute commands with unrestricted privileges on the underlying operating system that hosts vCenter Server,” VMware said in its advisory.

According to Positive Technologies, while 90 percent of vCenter devices are only accessible from within an organization’s perimeter — exploitation of the vulnerability in this case requires access to the target’s internal network — there are more than 6,000 systems that are accessible directly from the internet.

The cybersecurity firm said more than a quarter of these devices are located in the United States, followed by Germany (7%), France (6%), China (6%), the UK (4%), Canada (4%), Russia (3%), Taiwan (3%), Iran (3%), and Italy (3%).

“In our opinion, the RCE vulnerability in the vCenter Server can pose no less a threat than the infamous vulnerability in Citrix (CVE-2019-19781),” Positive Technologies’ Klyuchnikov explained. “The error allows an unauthorized user to send a specially crafted request, which will later give them the opportunity to execute arbitrary commands on the server.”

He added, “After receiving such an opportunity, the attacker can develop this attack, successfully move through the corporate network, and gain access to the data stored in the attacked system (such as information about virtual machines and system users). If the vulnerable software can be accessed from the Internet, this will allow an external attacker to penetrate the company’s external perimeter and also gain access to sensitive data. Once again, I would like to note that this vulnerability is dangerous, as it can be used by any unauthorized user.”

Klyuchnikov has also been credited for a medium-severity server-side request forgery (SSRF) flaw in vCenter Server, specifically in a plugin used by the vSphere Client. An attacker with network access to port 443 could exploit this vulnerability to obtain information — including on open ports associated with various services — that could be useful for further attacks.

VMware has also informed users about CVE-2021-21974, a high-severity heap overflow in ESXi that can be exploited by an attacker with network access to port 427 to execute arbitrary code.

The issue was reported to VMware by Lucas Leong of Trend Micro’s Zero Day Initiative (ZDI). ZDI has yet to make its own advisory for this vulnerability public.

VMware has released patches and workarounds for each of the affected products and versions.

It’s important that organizations using affected products apply the patches or workarounds since VMware product vulnerabilities being targeted by threat actors is not unheard of. The NSA warned recently that a state-sponsored threat actor linked to Russia had exploited a flaw in VMware Workspace ONE, likely even before a patch was released by the virtualization giant.

Related: VMware Patches Vulnerabilities Exploited at Chinese Hacking Contest

Related: VMware Patches Workspace ONE Access Vulnerability Reported by NSA

Related: Patch for Critical VMware ESXi Vulnerability Incomplete

view counter

Eduard Kovacs (@EduardKovacs) is a contributing editor at SecurityWeek. He worked as a high school IT teacher for two years before starting a career in journalism as Softpedia’s security news reporter. Eduard holds a bachelor’s degree in industrial informatics and a master’s degree in computer techniques applied in electrical engineering.

Previous Columns by Eduard Kovacs:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/1nMV3DFn9Ag/critical-vmware-vcenter-server-flaw-can-expose-organizations-remote-attacks




Is Your Suppliers’ Security Your Business?

Companies Must to Look Beyond Their Own Company to Also Consider the Security Measures Their Immediate Suppliers Have in Place 

The number of cyberattacks on industrial sites of all sizes is increasing significantly, with risk spreading across supply chains. An ESG survey of 150 cybersecurity and IT professionals in mid-market and enterprise manufacturing organizations, found 53% say their operational technology (OT) infrastructure is vulnerable to some type of cyberattack, while the same number state that they have already suffered a cyberattack or other security incident in the last 12-24 months that impacted their OT infrastructure. Manufacturers are part of trading partner networks that are intertwined, and when they are compromised, the effects ripple across all parties in the supply chain. The impact of an attack on a first-tier supplier can be just as devastating as if the attack initially penetrated your own OT network. Production lines can be shut down, creating significant costs, negatively impacting revenue, and causing reputational damage.

For years, threat actors have taken advantage of weak links in the supply chain as stepping-stones to infiltrate other organizations. We all remember the Target security breach nearly a decade ago, in which attackers used stolen credentials from an HVAC systems vendor to access Target’s network and move laterally until finally stealing bank card and personal information of millions of customers. A few years later, the NotPetya ransomware was another high-profile supply chain attack that initially poisoned software from a Ukrainian accounting firm and went on to affect multinational corporations and cause an estimated $10 billion in damages. More recently, the SolarWinds Orion software compromise and SUNBURST backdoor has allowed a threat actor to gain access to numerous organizations around the world. The scope and impact of this attack is still being understood. 

Industry action

Supply chain cybersecurity is now top of mind for executives and security leaders across industries, and government agencies, industry groups, and regulators are taking action in an effort to mitigate risk. As a vaccine for COVID-19 came closer to reality, IBM issued a warning of unknown threat actors targeting the COVID-19 vaccine supply chain, highlighting the need to reduce exposure of OT environments, the increased capabilities of attackers, and the urgency and severity of supply chain risk. Within the power industry, Protect Our Power has proposed (PDF) an end-to-end model framework for cyber supply chain risk management as a baseline for use by regulators. New automotive industry cybersecurity regulations (PDF) will be mandatory for all new vehicles produced in the European Union from July 2024, with Japan and Korea implementing something similar. While new cybersecurity standards to establish “cybersecurity by design” throughout the entire lifecycle of a vehicle are under development.

What security leaders can do 

Supply Chain Security Virtual EventSupply chain cyber risk is complicated and spans the entire lifecycle of a product—across design, manufacturing, distribution, storage, and maintenance. The more protracted and complex the lifecycle, the more opportunities for threat actors to exploit the product by targeting less secure elements in the chain. And because supply chains are often global and span multiple tiers of suppliers, the responsibility of security doesn’t rest with a single organization. Each member has a role to play, which makes supply chain cyber risk particularly challenging to mitigate.

That’s why, when creating business continuity plans, executives need to look beyond their own company to also consider the security measures their immediate suppliers have in place and how they, in turn, manage and mitigate risk with their extended network of suppliers. These five steps can help:

1. Communication and assessment: Managing this critical risk starts with determining internal responsibility for procurement and verifying a partner’s process security. This requires legal teams to be involved, in addition to technology and line-of-business leaders across business units and geographies. Decision makers need threat intelligence related to supply chain attacks to make informed decisions about risks to the business. Secure procurement and data protection must be wrapped in effective communication with partners and internal stakeholders.

2. Detailed operational visibility: Consider a dedicated industrial cybersecurity solution capable of overcoming OT-specific challenges, which include a lack of standardized technology, the use of proprietary protocols, and a low tolerance for disruptions to critical processes. A platform that continuously monitors and detects threats across the OT network, connects to your organization’s existing security network, and also connects to all access points with your supply chain partners extends this visibility across all key parties. 

3. Consistent cybersecurity standards: Keep up to date with emerging regulations and standards and new alerts. Adhere to the industry-specific recommendations detailed in the July 23 CISA alert, which can help mitigate increased cyber risk driven by growing connectivity of OT assets to the Internet across all 16 U.S. critical-infrastructure sectors.

4. Strengthened cybersecurity coalitions: Given the critical urgency of the current moment, many executives and board members have become attuned to operational concerns and more aware of why having the right cyber defense technology and processes in place is essential for ensuring availability, reliability, and safety. As a security leader, seize the moment to garner cross-functional buy-in for supporting present and future industrial cybersecurity initiatives.

5. Collaborative approach: Your supply chain is an integral part of your business ecosystem. As such, it needs to be an integrated part of your security ecosystem and protected with the same level of defenses. Cloud-based solutions simplify secure connectivity with key supply chain partners. They can also be more secure, updated more easily, and have new features added more quickly. But even if the transition to the cloud isn’t yet feasible within your industry due to regulatory requirements, you can still set benchmarks and share reports and insights into vulnerabilities and hygiene risk with your supply chain partners.

So, back to the question: “Is your suppliers’ security your business?” The answer is a resounding YES. Not only is it your business, but the very future of your business could be at stake. Fortunately, there are steps you can take to mitigate risk and the timing is right to move fast.

Learn More at SecurityWeek’s Supply Chain Security Summit March 10, 2020

view counter

Yaniv Vardi is CEO of Claroty, an operational technology (OT) security company. Prior to Claroty, he served as the Global Managing Director of Centrica Business Solutions, International, managing eight countries and expanding the company’s proposition mainly in Europe, South America, and Asia Pacific into a significant business. Before Centrica, he was CEO of Panoramic Power, a global pioneer in energy management solutions for global C&I customers, which was acquired by Centrica. Previously, he was Co-founder and Managing Director of Sparta Systems EMEA, where he successfully drove its operations to be the leading provider of QMS in the Life Science industry, resulting in a successful acquisition. Based on his wealth of experience, Vardi brings vital knowledge of operational direction and strategies as a board director and chairman in different companies in Israel, Europe, and the United States. He graduated Magna Cum Laude from the New Jersey Institute of Technology, majoring in Industrial and Management Engineering and Management of Information Systems, and served in the Israeli Air Force for five years.

Previous Columns by Yaniv Vardi:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/hz7sZ9MZ5Hg/your-suppliers-security-your-business




Australian Health and Transport Agencies Hit by Accellion Hack

Transport for NSW, which is the main transport and roads agency in New South Wales, Australia, and NSW Health, the state’s ministry of health, are the latest confirmed victims of a cyber-attack targeting Accellion’s FTA file transfer service.

Transport for NSW says that some information was stolen before the attack on Accellion servers was interrupted and that an investigation is ongoing, but did not provide further details on the matter.

“Transport for NSW will ensure that any notification process for those affected will be clearly communicated and secure,” the company says.

In a statement related to the incident, Cyber Security NSW says that it is working with the NSW government to investigate the incident and assess the volume and value of data.

“Forensic analysis by industry specialists has established there was no third-party access to major agency systems including the Driver Licence systems, the Opal travel systems, or electronic medical records systems used by public hospitals,” Cyber Security NSW notes.

The cyber-incident happened in mid-December 2020, when a hacking group that FireEye’s Mandiant security researchers tracks as UNC2546 exploited an SQL injection flaw in FTA, which allowed it to deploy web shells and access customer data.

A total of four vulnerabilities in FTA were targeted in the attack, all of which have already been patched. However, Accellion is moving forth with plans to retire the service.

Designed to allow customers to transfer large files, FTA is over two decades old, and will no longer receive support past April 30, 2021. In December, Accellion served roughly 300 FTA customers, fewer than 100 of which were affected. However, up to 25 of them suffered significant data theft, the company says.

Transport for NSW and NSW Health are the latest organizations to have publicly confirmed the impact of the incident, after the U.S.-based grocery and pharmacy chain Kroger and law firm Jones Day made similar announcements over the past several days. To date, eight entities have confirmed impact from the incident.

Both Accellion and the affected customers have confirmed that the attackers only accessed data through the vulnerable FTA service, with no other systems being exposed.

The attackers, which FireEye linked to the TA505 spin-off FIN11, attempted to extort victims, threatening to share the stolen data publicly, and even following through with the threats in some cases.

With the looming end-of-life for FTA, Accellion continues to encourage customers to migrate to the enterprise content firewall platform kiteworks, promising free assistance during the transition.

Related: Over 1 Million Impacted by Data Breach at Washington State Auditor

Related: New Zealand Central Bank Says Accellion Service at Heart of Cyberattack

Related: Australian Corporate Regulator Discloses Breach Involving Accellion Software

view counter

Ionut Arghire is an international correspondent for SecurityWeek.

Previous Columns by Ionut Arghire:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/_0BgFSa59GQ/australian-health-and-transport-agencies-hit-accellion-hack




Attacks Targeting Accellion Product Linked to FIN11 Cybercrime Group

The hacking group behind the recent cyber-attack targeting Accellion’s FTA file transfer service appears to be linked to a threat actor known as FIN11, security researchers with FireEye’s Mandiant division reveal.

The attacks on FTA, a soon-to-be-retired service, started in mid-December 2020 and resulted in the compromise of data pertaining to multiple Accellion customers. As part of the attack, the adversaries targeted multiple vulnerabilities in the file transfer service.

Some of the affected Accellion customers include grocery and pharmacy chain Kroger, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), U.S.-based law firm Jones Day, the Office of the Washington State Auditor (SAO), the Reserve Bank of New Zealand, and Singapore telecoms firm Singtel.

The attackers abused multiple vulnerabilities in FTA to gain access to and exfiltrate data, namely CVE-2021-27101 (SQL injection), CVE-2021-27102 (OS command execution), CVE-2021-27103 (SSRF), and CVE-2021-27104 (OS command execution).

Accellion says that all of these vulnerabilities have already been addressed and that, out of “300 total FTA clients, fewer than 100 were victims of the attack,” with fewer than 25 suffering “significant data theft.”

“Accellion strongly recommends that FTA customers migrate to kiteworks, Accellion’s enterprise content firewall platform. These exploits apply exclusively to Accellion FTA clients: neither kiteworks nor Accellion the company were subject to these attacks,” Accellion said on Monday.

FireEye’s Mandiant security researchers have been tracking both the activity surrounding the exploitation of the Accellion FTA zero-day vulnerabilities and the data theft that resulted from the cyber-attack, and say they have discovered a connection between the attacks, extortion attempts related to the stolen data, and the FIN11 group.

A financially-motivated threat actor, FIN11 was previously described as a TA505 spin-off, engaging in ransomware and extortion activities that typically start with phishing emails. Previously, the attackers were associated with the use of the FlawedAmmyy and the CLOP ransomware.

Tracked as UNC2546, the adversary that targeted FTA exploited the SQL injection vulnerability for initial access, which allowed them to retrieve a key used in conjunction with a request to a specific file, followed by the execution of the built-in Accellion utility admin.pl and the deployment of a web shell.

Dubbed DEWMODE, the web shell allowed the attackers to fetch a list of available files and corresponding metadata (file ID, filename, path, recipient, and uploader) from a MySQL database, as well as to download the files themselves.

Weeks after the data theft occurred, the security researchers observed extortion attempts related to the data. The extortion emails received by the victims threatened to make the information public on the “CL0P^_- LEAKS” .onion website, which Mandiant has associated with a different actor, tracked as UNC2582.

“Despite tracking the exploitation and extortion activity in separate threat clusters we have observed at least one case where an actor interacted with a DEWMODE web shell from a host that was used to send UNC2582-attributed extortion email,” Mandiant says.

The UNC2582 threat actor, the researchers explain, initially sends extortion emails to a small number of addresses within the target organization. If no reply is received in a timely manner, the messages are sent to multiple other addresses.

Furthermore, the adversary appears to be following through with the threats, publishing victim data on the CL0P^_- LEAKS shaming website. Recently, information stolen from at least two organizations affected by the FTA cyber-attack was published on the site.

Mandiant also discovered some overlaps between the UNC2582 and FIN11 infrastructure, as some of the email messages were sent from IP addresses and/or email accounts that FIN11 previously used in various phishing attacks.

While FIN11 is known to be pausing activities during the winter holidays, the recent hiatus overlaps with UNC2582’s data theft extortion activity. Furthermore, links that the extortionists sent to their victims were directed to websites that were previously used in ransomware and data theft extortion campaigns attributed to FIN11.

The researchers also identified overlaps between UNC2546 and FIN11 activities, such as the targeting of the same organizations, and the use of an IP address (to communicate with a DEWMODE web shell) that was in a network frequently used by FIN11 for a piece of malware named FRIENDSPEAK.

“The overlaps between FIN11, UNC2546, and UNC2582 are compelling, but we continue to track these clusters separately while we evaluate the nature of their relationships. One of the specific challenges is that the scope of the overlaps with FIN11 is limited to the later stages of the attack life cycle,” Mandiant concludes.

Related: Double Extortion: Ransomware’s New Normal Combining Encryption with Data Theft

view counter

Ionut Arghire is an international correspondent for SecurityWeek.

Previous Columns by Ionut Arghire:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/ZlHITdxBrG0/attacks-targeting-accellion-product-linked-fin11-cybercrime-group




Robinhood Taps Caleb Sima to Lead Security

Caleb Sima to Join Robinhood as Chief Security Officer

Veteran cybersecurity practitioner, entrepreneur and executive Caleb Sima has been tapped to lead security at mobile stock trading startup Robinhood.

Sima, a security leader with an established presence in cybersecurity for more than two decades, announced the move on LinkedIn. He will be joining investing firm Robinhood as Chief Security Officer (CSO).

Sima was most recently VP of Security at Databricks and, before that, he managed security engineering, architecture, red team and vulnerability management at Capital One.

In the early 2000s, Sima co-founded application security startup SPI Dynamics and sold it to HP.  He also co-founded Bluebox Security, a mobile security play that was acquired by Lookout in 2016.

Sima joins the embattled financial services firm RobinHood at a sensitive time, with the company facing massive mainstream media attention. The Menlo Park., Calif-based company claims that about 13 million users trade stock and ETFs on its mobile app. 

The news of Sima’s hiring comes on the same day Reddit announced it had snagged Bank of America security executive Allison Miller to be its Chief Information Security Officer (CISO).

In other CISO-related people news, Cisco has promoted Anthony Grieco to the CISO slot following the departure of Mike Hanley.

Akamai’s Andy Ellis is also leaving the CSO role there after a 20-year career.

Related: Stock Trading Firm Robinhood Stored User Passwords in Plaintext

view counter

Previous Columns by SecurityWeek News:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/-WnQ3ai15A4/robinhood-taps-caleb-sima-lead-security




Chinese Hackers Cloned Equation Group Exploit Years Before Shadow Brokers Leak

A Chinese threat actor known as APT31 likely acquired and cloned one of the Equation Group’s exploits three years before the targeted vulnerability was publicly exposed as part of Shadow Brokers’ “Lost in Translation” leak, cybersecurity firm Check Point says in a new report.

Tracked as CVE-2017-0005, the vulnerability was addressed by Microsoft in March 2017, after Lockheed Martin’s Computer Incident Response Team observed a possible attack against an American target and reported it to the Redmond-based tech giant.

Attributed to APT31, a Chinese hacking group also tracked as Zirconium, the exploit for this vulnerability is, in fact, the clone of an Equation Group exploit code-named “EpMe,” Check Point says.

Exploitation tools that the Equation Group had been using for years were made public in early 2017 by a mysterious group calling themselves Shadow Brokers. The Equation Group has been linked to the Tailored Access Operations (TAO) unit of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA).

The Shadow Brokers, which some believe was backed by Russia, claimed at the time to have obtained the tools after an intrusion into Equation Group’s systems. They released several series of exploits for free, but also attempted to monetize the data.

In March 2017, Microsoft patched CVE-2017-0005, a Windows local privilege escalation (LPE) vulnerability that had been actively exploited by a Chinese threat actor. Called Jian and attributed to APT31, the exploit for this vulnerability is now believed to be the clone of an Equation Group exploit that targeted the same security hole.

Dated 2013, the original exploit is codenamed EpMe, and is one of the 4 different LPE exploits (ElEi, ErNi, EpMe, and EpMo) in the Equation Group’s DanderSpritz attack framework that was publicly disclosed in April 2017. These exploits, however, did not receive the same coverage as Eternal Blue (ETBL), Eternal Romance (ETRO), and other tools leaked by Shadow Brokers.

A dive into the DanderSpritz attack framework revealed that two of the targeted vulnerabilities are old (ElEi was targeting CVE-2011-3402, while ErNi aimed at CVE-2013-3128), that one of them has no CVE identifier, despite being patched in March 2017 (EpMo), and that the fourth had been cloned by APT31 approximately three years before patching (EpMe targeted CVE-2017-0005).

Check Point’s security researchers discovered that, following the release of a patch for CVE-2017-0005, both the EpMe and the Jian exploits stopped working. While having two adversaries targeting the same security bug could be a coincidence, a comparison between the two exploits revealed code similarities, shared constants, and a completely identical memory layout.

Further analysis has revealed that the exploits contain artefacts specific to the Equation Group tools, suggesting that EpMe was the original exploit for CVE-2017-0005, Check Point says. APT31 was apparently able to capture the exploit and clone it in 2014 (Jian), and started using it roughly the same year, until the 2017 patch was released.

“To our surprise, we found out that this APT31 exploit is in fact a reconstructed version of an Equation Group exploit called ‘EpMe’. This means that an Equation Group exploit was eventually used by a Chinese-affiliated group, probably against American targets,” Check Point notes.

Related: Firewall Vendors Analyze Exploits Leaked by “Shadow Brokers”

Related: Chinese Hackers Used NSA Tool a Year Before Shadow Brokers Leak

view counter

Ionut Arghire is an international correspondent for SecurityWeek.

Previous Columns by Ionut Arghire:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/WdkRgZ0AUog/chinese-hackers-cloned-equation-group-exploit-years-shadow-brokers-leak




Inside the Battle to Control Enterprise Security Data Lakes

Cybersecurity Data Lakes

NEWS ANALYSIS: The strategic positioning to own and control the massive data lakes powering enterprise security programs took another expensive turn with CrowdStrike announcing it would shell out $400 million to buy early-stage log analytics start-up Humio.

The $400 million cash-and-equity deal represents a massive exit for Humio, a company that raised just $32 million in two funding rounds led by Dell Technologies Capital.  Humio has about 70 employees in the U.S., London and Denmark and has found a niche as an affordable — but powerful — alternative to bigger vendors in the lucrative log analytics space.

The CrowdStrike/Humio marriage signals a continuation of the trend by  anti-malware vendors to beef up data logging and indexing capabilities to cash in on “proactively-collect-and-store-everything” policies at larger enterprises. 

Elastic (the company behind ElasticSearch and Elastic Stack) kicked off the push with the 2019 acquisition of Endgame ($234 million price tag) and SentinelOne followed up earlier this month with its $155 million purchase of Scalyr.

That’s $789 million in just three deals combining anti-malware capabilities with the always-on log analytics tools required to parse through terabytes of data per data to find signs of malware and other malicious activities.

[PREVIOUSLY: Microsoft’s 10 Billion Cybersecurity Business]

Yet, that figure is peanuts compared to the $10 billion a year figure floated by Microsoft as its cybersecurity-specific revenue haul or the $3.5 billion that Palo Alto Networks rakes in from its security product lines.  

Microsoft has emerged as the elephant in the room, having cleverly positioned itself as the data lake for customers in its Windows/Azure/Defender ecosystem.

It’s yet to be seen how these mergers affect the larger SIEM (Security Information and Event Management) category, where big-ticket products jostle to provide real-time analysis of security alerts generated by applications and network hardware.

Network defenders and security analysts expect the deals to immediately shake up pricing models at big-name log analytics and SIEM vendors. The pay-per-usage model can be incredibly expensive for defenders ingesting, logging and indexing terabytes of data per day.

This led to a sharp shift with the emergence of startups like Chronicle (now folded back into Google Cloud) and Humio pushing flat-rate pricing and unlimited indexing to snap up market share from the likes of Splunk, Sumo Logic and Datadog.

CrowdStrike claims it already processes around five trillion security-related events per week and, with the Humio technology added to its stack, gives it some room in what Gartner is describing as “eXtended Detection and Response (XDR)” category.

The great promise of XDR is to match all the endpoint data with network telemetry from other sources to provide more visibility into hidden attack surfaces.   With the Humio tech,  CrowdStrike can now market a complete suite to ingest and correlate data from any log, application or feed to deliver actionable insights and real-time protection. 

CrowdStrike chief executive George Kurtz said the company did a “thorough market review of existing solutions” before making the decision to buy Humio’s technology architecture and ability to deliver at scale.

Assuming the integration goes smoothly, CrowdStrike expects to eventually market a platform that spans endpoints, identities, the network edge, and the cloud, offering that “unified data layer” to help enterprise security and IT operations. 

RELATED: Humio Raises $20 Million in Series B Funding 

RELATED: CrowdStrike Buys Preempt Security for $96 Million

view counter

Ryan Naraine is Editor-at-Large at SecurityWeek and host of the popular Security Conversations podcast series. Ryan is a journalist and cybersecurity strategist with more than 20 years experience covering IT security and technology trends. He is a regular speaker at cybersecurity conferences around the world.
Ryan has built security engagement programs at major global brands, including Intel Corp., Bishop Fox and Kaspersky GReAT. He is a co-founder of Threatpost and the global SAS conference series. Ryan’s career as a journalist includes bylines at major technology publications including Ziff Davis eWEEK, CBS Interactive’s ZDNet, PCMag and PC World.
Follow Ryan on Twitter @ryanaraine.

Previous Columns by Ryan Naraine:
Tags:

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/Securityweek/~3/ZeYP5HDD2Ao/inside-battle-control-enterprise-security-data-lakes