Broadcast and Cable News Outlets Added to Letters in Support of the Associated Press

  Rassegna Stampa, Social
image_pdfimage_print

Donald Trump‘s administration has given the Associated Press the cold shoulder treatment in recent weeks. Reporters from the news organization have been barred from attending White House events and boarding Air Force 1 due to the AP refusing to recognize the administration’s depiction of the body of water bordering the southern states as the “Gulf of America.” 

Broadcast and cable news outlets, including ABC News, NBC News, CBS News, CNN, Fox News, and Newsmax, are among nearly 40 news organizations that have signed a confidential letter from the White House Correspondents’ Association (WHCA) in support of the AP.

According to StatusOliver Darcy, the letter called for the White House to lift its ban on the AP, saying, “The First Amendment prohibits the government from asserting control over how news organizations make editorial decisions. Any attempt to punish journalists for those decisions is a serious breach of this Constitutional protection.”

In a statement to The New York Times’ Katie Robertson showing why it’s supporting the AP, Newsmax said, “We fear a future administration may not like something Newsmax writes and seeks to ban us.”

In addition to the letter from the WHCA, these news outlets also added their names to a letter from the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press asking for the restoration of the AP’s pool participation, ensuring that access to future events shall not be hindered because of editorial disagreements.

“Conditioning pool access to White House events on the editorial decisions of any news organization violates First Amendment principles,” the letter said. “All news organizations covering the White House are negatively affected when one peer outlet is singled out in a manner that crosses a constitutional line. As a group, we ask you to restore AP’s pool participation and ensure that going forward, access to White House events is not predicated on improper considerations or disagreement with editorial choices.”

Pagine: 1 2